<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: weatherbot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.daynemay.com/2008/06/weatherbot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.daynemay.com/2008/06/weatherbot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hoff</title>
		<link>http://blog.daynemay.com/2008/06/weatherbot/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daynemay.com/?p=48#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Haha, &quot;shenanigans&quot;. Actually, Google is up to some shenanigans. Looks like someone registered our new bot.im domain on google apps and google is forwarding all gtalk jabber traffic to their servers as opposed to our jabber server. You can still contact your bot using any other jabber account. We&#039;ve contacted google and hope to have it resolved soon. And yes, anyone can claim they own a domain while signing up for google apps which will essentially &quot;lock out&quot; the real domain owner from administering it. Crazy, but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, &#8220;shenanigans&#8221;. Actually, Google is up to some shenanigans. Looks like someone registered our new bot.im domain on google apps and google is forwarding all gtalk jabber traffic to their servers as opposed to our jabber server. You can still contact your bot using any other jabber account. We&#8217;ve contacted google and hope to have it resolved soon. And yes, anyone can claim they own a domain while signing up for google apps which will essentially &#8220;lock out&#8221; the real domain owner from administering it. Crazy, but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
